In the last few decades, scientists have been testing with animals in order to achieve new goals such as medical advances. The problem is that the suffering of those animals and also the number of animals involved are both too high compared to the range of benefits that are taken from them. The question is, should we change something about this experimenting method?
The supporters of animal testing say that with this method the humanity is able to discover new beneficial things that couldn’t be obtained in any other away.
The people who are against it complain that the experiments harm animals and even cause their death. They propose using computer models instead of animals.
In my case, I would choose a neutral position. Like other experts in research and investigation, I would be a defender of the application of the three R’s (Reduction, Refinement and Replacement) Some countries such as Spain are approving new laws allowing the implementation of the three R’s.
The introduction and the conclusion shouldn't be longer than the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs. I expected something better!
ResponderEliminar